Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

World

Trump Justice Department seized CNN reporter’s email and phone records, United States News & Top Stories


WASHINGTON (NYTIMES) – The Justice Department under the Trump administration targeted the phone and email records of a prominent CNN journalist who covers the Pentagon as part of an investigation into the apparent disclosure of classified information, the network revealed on Thursday (May 20).

Federal prosecutors secretly obtained the records, which covered a two-month period beginning in June 2017.

In a letter to CNN, prosecutors acknowledged they not only sought records for Ms Barbara Starr’s work and personal email accounts, but also phone records for her offices at the Pentagon and at home, as well as for her cellphones.

It was not clear which CNN article prompted the Justice Department to obtain the records, but seeking them is supposed to be the last step that FBI agents and prosecutors take after exhausting all other efforts to uncover the source of sensitive information.

“CNN strongly condemns the secret collection of any aspect of a journalist’s correspondence, which is clearly protected by the First Amendment,” said Mr Jeff Zucker, the network’s president. “We are asking for an immediate meeting with the Justice Department for an explanation.”

CNN said the department had received “non-content information” from Ms Starr’s email accounts. That means prosecutors were able to see who sent emails and when, but were not able to read them.

The disclosure that the Justice Department had seized the CNN reporter’s records comes less than two weeks after prosecutors revealed they had secretly obtained the phone records of three reporters at The Washington Post in the early months of the Trump administration.

The Justice Department under President Donald Trump also prosecuted a former Senate aide over his contacts with reporters in a case where prosecutors secretly seized years’ worth of a New York Times reporter’s phone and email records.

In the case of The Post, the reporters had written an article during that time period that referred to US surveillance intercepts, which are highly classified and some of the most closely held secrets in the government.

A spokesman for the Justice Department, Mr Anthony D. Coley, said in a statement on Thursday that “the records at issue relate to 2017, and the legal process to seek these records was approved in 2020”.

He added that “department leadership will soon meet with reporters to hear their concerns about recent notices” and to impart Attorney General Merrick Garland’s “staunch support of and commitment to a free and independent press”.

The Justice Department’s decision to seek a court order for the CNN reporter’s records would have required the approval of the attorney general at the time, Mr William Barr, as it would have in the Post case.

Mr Trump frequently took aim at CNN and The Post, accusing the outlets of peddling “fake news”.

In early 2017, he said he had directed the Justice Department to look into the leaks, which he called “criminal”.

Several months after Trump’s comments, Mr Jeff Sessions, the attorney general at the time, announced that the Justice Department was pursuing about three times as many leak investigations as were open at the end of the Obama administration.

Sessions said that the FBI had created a counterintelligence unit to specialise in such cases. Former federal law enforcement officials said the leak cases were consolidated, with prosecutors and agents working them. Leak prosecutions are rare and notoriously difficult.

The Obama administration oversaw nearly a dozen leak-related prosecutions, more than all previous presidents combined.

The Justice Department’s rules require investigators to exhaust all other ways to obtain the information they are seeking before examining reporters’ phone logs or subpoenaing journalists for notes or testimony that could force them to help investigators identify their confidential sources, or face imprisonment for contempt. The rules are intended to limit any chilling effect on the news-gathering process.

After the department under President Barack Obama subpoenaed the phone records of editors and reporters at The Associated Press and Fox News in separate leak investigations, the administration endured a backlash from the news media.

In 2013, Attorney General Eric Holder revised Justice Department rules to further tighten limits on when the government is allowed to subpoena telephone companies for logs of a reporter’s phone calls. The changes made it harder for law enforcement officials to obtain such records without providing advance notice and giving news organisations a chance to contest the request in court.

Unless, however, the attorney general “determines that, for compelling reasons, such negotiations or notice would pose a clear and substantial threat to the integrity of the investigation, risk grave harm to national security, or present an imminent risk of death or serious bodily harm,” according to the guidelines.

Typically, the federal agencies that make the criminal referrals to the Justice Department have to answer a list of 11 questions about the leak and the damage it caused, including how widely the information was disseminated throughout the government and whether it was accurate.





Source link

Leave your vote

Comments

0 comments

You May Also Like

Politics

Sed ut perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus error sit voluptatem accusantium doloremque laudantium, totam rem aperiam, eaque ipsa quae.

Finance

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.

Politics

Quis autem vel eum iure reprehenderit qui in ea voluptate velit esse quam nihil molestiae consequatur, vel illum qui dolorem eum.

Finance

Neque porro quisquam est, qui dolorem ipsum quia dolor sit amet, consectetur, adipisci velit, sed quia non numquam eius modi tempora.

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.